| dc.identifier.citation | Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Biggs in Cooper and Greive. 2009. The Effectiveness of the Methods of Reciprocal Teaching. Bos, S.C. and Vaugh, S. 2009. Strategies for Teaching Students With Learning And Behaviour Problems seventh edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Brassell, Danny & Rasinski, T. 2008. Comprehension that works. Huntington : Shell education. Brown, D.H. 2001. Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy second edition. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, inc. Burns. 2010. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cooper, T. and Greive, C. 2009. The Effectiveness of the Methods of Reciprocal Teaching.ResearchOnline@Avondale,45-47. Díaz, S., &Laguado, J. (2013). Action Research. Journal of Studies in Education. Improving Reading Skills through Skimming and Scanning Techniques at a Public School.10(1), 134-150. 48 Doolittle, P. E., Hicks, D., Triplett C. Nichols, W. D., & Young, C. A. 2006. Reciprocal teaching for reading comprehension in higher education: A strategy for fostering the deeper understanding of the texts. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 106-118. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFLteacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Methods in teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 187-204). Boston: Heinle&Heinle. Grabe, W. 2009. Reading in a Second Language Moving From Theory to Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hedgecock, J., & Ferris, D. R. 2009. Teaching readers of English: Students, textsand contexts. New York: Routledge. Jhonson, A, H. 2008. Teaching reading and writing. United states of America : Roman & littlefield education. Kemmis and Mc Taggart in Burns. 2010. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McNamara, D.S., &Magliano, J. P. 2009. Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Rose (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp.297-384). New York, NY: Academic Press. 49 Omari and Weshah. 2010. Using the Reciprocal Teaching Method by Teachers at Jordanian Schools. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol.15. No.1 Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. 1984. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. Richards and Renandya. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching an Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Westwood Peter. 2008. What Teachers Need to Know About Reading and Writing Difficulties. Camberwell: ACER Press | id_ID |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study was to investigated the effect of implementing the Reciprocal
Teaching Method (RTM) in teaching reading comprehension to the first grade students’ of SMA Negeri 1 Muara Jawa. Reciprocal Teaching Method is one of spacious method that has four strategies: predicting, clarifying, summarizing, and questioning. The quantitative and qualitative were utilized in order to collect the data. The data were collected through observations, test, and interview, in which one class is taken as the sample consist 34 students’ of this study. The result showed that the students’ were active and intensively improved their reading proficiency during the RTM was implemented. And it could be said that the use of Reciprocal Teaching Method was considered effective in improving student’s reading comprehension. Therefore teachers are suggested to consider using this method for teaching reading that instils the students on how to apply the four comprehension strategies used in reading. | id_ID |
