DSpace Repository

Pengaruh Lingkungan dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Kementerian Agama Kota Samarinda

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Makian, Nursan
dc.contributor.author Nurfadillah, Mursidah
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-11T12:10:46Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-11T12:10:46Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-19
dc.identifier.citation Agung Nugroho. 2005. Strategi Jitu Memilih Metode Statistik Penelitian dengan SPSS. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta. Ahyari, Agus. 2002. Manajemen Produksi : Pengendalian Produksi. Edisi IV. Buku Dua, BPFE UGM. Yogyakarta. Alex S. Nitisemito. 1992. Manajemen dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE UGM. Yogyakarta. Ali, Suryadharma. 2010. Peraturan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia No.16 Tahun 2010, Tentang Pengelolaan Pendidikan Agama pada Sekolah. Jakarta : Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia. Anoraga, Panji. 1992. Psikologi Kerja. Penerbit PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian. Penerbit PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Azwar, S. 2009. Sikap Manusia, Teori dan Pengukurannya. Pustaka Pelajar. Jakarta. Bangun Wilson. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Kompensasi.Jakarta: Erlangga. Campbell D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. Dharmawan, I Made Yusa. 2011. Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Non Fisik Terhadap Disiplin dan Kinerja Karyawan Hotel Nikki Denpasar. Tesis. Jurusan Manajemen Universitas Udayana. Denpasar. Doni Fatah. 2015. Pengaruh Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Dan Konstruksi Bangunan. Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung. Feriyanto Andri, Triana Shyta Endang. 2015. Pengantar Manajemen 3in1. Kebumen : Mediatera. Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. Edisi V. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. Gomes, dan Cardoso, Faustino. 2010, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan kesembilan. PT. Gunung Agung. Jakarta Husein Umar. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Kasmir. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Disiplin. Jakarta:PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Erlangga. Jakarta. L Daft. 2002. Management. Edisi 6, Buku 1. Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Lenny Evanita. 2013. Disiplin Kerja, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Pelatihan dan Kinerja Karyawan RSUD Lubuk Sikaping. Tesis. Universitas Esa Unggul. Jakarta. Mardalis. 2008. Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta. Markus Doddy Simanjuntak. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Sumber Daya Manusia, Prasarana dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kopertis Wilayah I Medan. Tesis. Jurusan Ilmu Manajemen Universitas Sumatera Utara. Medan. McDaniel, C & Gates, R. 2013. Riset Pemasaran Kontemporer (Penerjemah Sumiyarto dan Rambat Lupiyoadi). Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pendidikan Agama Dan Pendidikan Keagamaan. Robbins, P.S. 2001. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi 8. Prentice Hall. Jakarta. Singarimbun, Masri. 1995. Metode Penelititan Survei. LP3S. Jakarta. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Bisnis : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung. Sunyoto, Danang. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. CAPS. Yogyakarta. Sutrisno, Edy. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Fajar Inter Pratama. Jakarta. Syamsuddin dan Yunus. 2009. Manajemen Srmber Daya Manusia, Cetakan kedua. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Umum dan Aptik. Jakarta. Veithzal, Rivai. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan Dari Teori ke Praktik. Edisi I. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. Warsito, Herman. 1992. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta. Wirjana, Bernardine R. 2007. Mencapai Manajemen Berkualitas. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta. Wursanto. 1987. Etika Komunikasi Kantor. Kanisius. Yogyakarta. id_ID
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.umkt.ac.id//handle/463.2017/923
dc.description.abstract This research is aimed at finding out whether work environment and discipline significantly affect employees’ performance and which variable is dominant towards the employees’ work performance in Ministry of Religious Affairs Samarinda. Those variables could be explained as the following. The result of multiple linear regression calculation was Y = 2.343 + 0.364 (X1) + 3.544 (X2). The value of correlation coefficient (R) was 0.702 which means there was a strong correlation between independent variable (X) and dependent variable (Y). The interpretation of correlation coefficient was at the interval between 0.492 – 0.702. Then, based on the value of coefficient of determination (R2) earned value 0.492 or 49.2% which means that the work environment and discipline affect the employees’ performance by 49.2% while the remaining 50.8% was contributed by other variables. The value of F acquired from F-test was 15.515 and the significant level was 0.000. Based on the output of F-test > F-distribution (15.515 > 3.29) and the value significant level of 0.000 was below 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). Hence it can be concluded that work environment and discipline variables significantly affected the employees’ performance (Ho rejected and Ha accepted). The t-statistic result for work environment variable showed beta value of 0.103 and the value of t-test was 0.364 with significant level of 0.718 which was higher than 0.05 (0.718 > 0.05), t-distribution was 1.694 which means t-test < t-distribution (0.364 < 1.694). It can be concluded that work environment variable did not significantly affect the employees’ performance (Ho accepted and Ha rejected). The work discipline variable showed beta value of 0.786 and t-test of 3.544 with significant level of 0.001 which was lower than 0.05 (0.001 < 0.05), t-distribution was 1.694 which means t-test > t-distribution (3.544 > 1.694). It can be concluded that work discipline variable significantly affected the employees’ performance (Ho rejected and Ha accepted). Based on partial F-test, the variable which significantly affected employees’ work performance in Ministry of Religious Affairs Samarinda was work discipline variable with t-test > t-distribution (3.544 > 1.694). Therefore the Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. id_ID
dc.language.iso id id_ID
dc.publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur id_ID
dc.subject Work environment id_ID
dc.subject work discipline id_ID
dc.subject work performance id_ID
dc.title Pengaruh Lingkungan dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Kementerian Agama Kota Samarinda id_ID
dc.title.alternative The Influence of Both Work Environment and Discipline Towards the Employee Performance in the Ministry of Religion in Samarinda id_ID
dc.type Other id_ID


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account