Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMakian, Nursan
dc.contributor.authorNurfadillah, Mursidah
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T12:10:46Z
dc.date.available2019-02-11T12:10:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-19
dc.identifier.citationAgung Nugroho. 2005. Strategi Jitu Memilih Metode Statistik Penelitian dengan SPSS. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta. Ahyari, Agus. 2002. Manajemen Produksi : Pengendalian Produksi. Edisi IV. Buku Dua, BPFE UGM. Yogyakarta. Alex S. Nitisemito. 1992. Manajemen dan Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE UGM. Yogyakarta. Ali, Suryadharma. 2010. Peraturan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia No.16 Tahun 2010, Tentang Pengelolaan Pendidikan Agama pada Sekolah. Jakarta : Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia. Anoraga, Panji. 1992. Psikologi Kerja. Penerbit PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian. Penerbit PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. Azwar, S. 2009. Sikap Manusia, Teori dan Pengukurannya. Pustaka Pelajar. Jakarta. Bangun Wilson. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Kompensasi.Jakarta: Erlangga. Campbell D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. Dharmawan, I Made Yusa. 2011. Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Non Fisik Terhadap Disiplin dan Kinerja Karyawan Hotel Nikki Denpasar. Tesis. Jurusan Manajemen Universitas Udayana. Denpasar. Doni Fatah. 2015. Pengaruh Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Dan Konstruksi Bangunan. Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung. Feriyanto Andri, Triana Shyta Endang. 2015. Pengantar Manajemen 3in1. Kebumen : Mediatera. Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. Edisi V. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. Gomes, dan Cardoso, Faustino. 2010, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan kesembilan. PT. Gunung Agung. Jakarta Husein Umar. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Kasmir. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Disiplin. Jakarta:PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Erlangga. Jakarta. L Daft. 2002. Management. Edisi 6, Buku 1. Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Lenny Evanita. 2013. Disiplin Kerja, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Pelatihan dan Kinerja Karyawan RSUD Lubuk Sikaping. Tesis. Universitas Esa Unggul. Jakarta. Mardalis. 2008. Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta. Markus Doddy Simanjuntak. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Sumber Daya Manusia, Prasarana dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Kopertis Wilayah I Medan. Tesis. Jurusan Ilmu Manajemen Universitas Sumatera Utara. Medan. McDaniel, C & Gates, R. 2013. Riset Pemasaran Kontemporer (Penerjemah Sumiyarto dan Rambat Lupiyoadi). Salemba Empat. Jakarta. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pendidikan Agama Dan Pendidikan Keagamaan. Robbins, P.S. 2001. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi 8. Prentice Hall. Jakarta. Singarimbun, Masri. 1995. Metode Penelititan Survei. LP3S. Jakarta. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Bisnis : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung. Sunyoto, Danang. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. CAPS. Yogyakarta. Sutrisno, Edy. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Fajar Inter Pratama. Jakarta. Syamsuddin dan Yunus. 2009. Manajemen Srmber Daya Manusia, Cetakan kedua. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Umum dan Aptik. Jakarta. Veithzal, Rivai. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan Dari Teori ke Praktik. Edisi I. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. Warsito, Herman. 1992. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta. Wirjana, Bernardine R. 2007. Mencapai Manajemen Berkualitas. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta. Wursanto. 1987. Etika Komunikasi Kantor. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.id_ID
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.umkt.ac.id//handle/463.2017/923
dc.description.abstractThis research is aimed at finding out whether work environment and discipline significantly affect employees’ performance and which variable is dominant towards the employees’ work performance in Ministry of Religious Affairs Samarinda. Those variables could be explained as the following. The result of multiple linear regression calculation was Y = 2.343 + 0.364 (X1) + 3.544 (X2). The value of correlation coefficient (R) was 0.702 which means there was a strong correlation between independent variable (X) and dependent variable (Y). The interpretation of correlation coefficient was at the interval between 0.492 – 0.702. Then, based on the value of coefficient of determination (R2) earned value 0.492 or 49.2% which means that the work environment and discipline affect the employees’ performance by 49.2% while the remaining 50.8% was contributed by other variables. The value of F acquired from F-test was 15.515 and the significant level was 0.000. Based on the output of F-test > F-distribution (15.515 > 3.29) and the value significant level of 0.000 was below 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). Hence it can be concluded that work environment and discipline variables significantly affected the employees’ performance (Ho rejected and Ha accepted). The t-statistic result for work environment variable showed beta value of 0.103 and the value of t-test was 0.364 with significant level of 0.718 which was higher than 0.05 (0.718 > 0.05), t-distribution was 1.694 which means t-test < t-distribution (0.364 < 1.694). It can be concluded that work environment variable did not significantly affect the employees’ performance (Ho accepted and Ha rejected). The work discipline variable showed beta value of 0.786 and t-test of 3.544 with significant level of 0.001 which was lower than 0.05 (0.001 < 0.05), t-distribution was 1.694 which means t-test > t-distribution (3.544 > 1.694). It can be concluded that work discipline variable significantly affected the employees’ performance (Ho rejected and Ha accepted). Based on partial F-test, the variable which significantly affected employees’ work performance in Ministry of Religious Affairs Samarinda was work discipline variable with t-test > t-distribution (3.544 > 1.694). Therefore the Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted.id_ID
dc.language.isoidid_ID
dc.publisherUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timurid_ID
dc.subjectWork environmentid_ID
dc.subjectwork disciplineid_ID
dc.subjectwork performanceid_ID
dc.titlePengaruh Lingkungan dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Kantor Kementerian Agama Kota Samarindaid_ID
dc.title.alternativeThe Influence of Both Work Environment and Discipline Towards the Employee Performance in the Ministry of Religion in Samarindaid_ID
dc.typeOtherid_ID


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record